One of the things Bernie Sanders has been saying is that change cannot come unless millions and millions of citizens stand up and demand change. Isn't this true in Tunica County also?
Why did we keep Jerry Gentry as our Superintendent of Education year after year? He didn't make our schools excellent.
Why did we elect Steve Chandler? He didn't have the experience. Look what happened to our schools under his leadership. Why wasn't all of Tunica County standing up to make him step down? Why did you leave this job to a small number number of our citizens?
Why did we re-elect Hamp as our Sheriff when there are so many lawsuits against his department. Do you really think he's done an excellent job? Do you think it is okay for Michael Thompson to be entrapped by your Sheriff and treated like a common criminal over a traffic ticket? Or would you only be upset if this happened to you?
Why do we keep electing Sharon Granberry? Wasn't the voter roll disaster in our last primary the last straw for you?
And our Election Commission. Why can't they keep our voter rolls updated and in good condition? Are you going to replace them in our next election?
And why would anyone vote for any Supervisor who was responsible for building all of these facilities that we are struggling to pay for? Our debt service is killing us.
And what about all of these manufacturing plants. How are they contributing to our General Fund?
We did Cedric Burnett get elected to the MS House? Do you believe he lives here? Did you think his voting record and his behavior while sitting at the Board of Supervisors' table served you well?
Do you think replacing Michael Thompson with Adrian McKay was a good move for our County? As we have learned, McKay somehow had the notion he didn't have to take orders from Thompson. Those of you who are complaining about the 2014 audit seem to want to put this blame at the feet of Thompson too. But isn't this the responsibility of Comptroller McKay? And now you think this same former Comptroller needs to hire his own staff? Does he think the Comptroller should takes orders from him?
So Tunica, when are you going to stand-up and demand the changes we need?
Sunday, January 31, 2016
Saturday, January 30, 2016
To be clear...
It has become necessary to change the settings on this blog due to some people continuing to comment and not identify him/her self. I find this kind of behavior cowardly. I don't mi d negative comments and will respond to anyone's alternate idea(s). I don't even mind the name calling as long as it is directed at me and not others who may be commenting.
So here is the new deal: all comments will now go into a holding file and I will publish or not publish them when I sign-on. Be patient. This ole gal has lots of projects to get done.
So here is the new deal: all comments will now go into a holding file and I will publish or not publish them when I sign-on. Be patient. This ole gal has lots of projects to get done.
Friday, January 29, 2016
28 Jan 2016: Board of Supervisors' Meeting
Let's start with this: The Sheriff didn't show but there were plenty of Officers there. One of them set-up a camera and through-out the meeting the camera remained in the same position...aimed at me. Hamp, I am a Whistleblower and you are harassing me and you are using public money to do it.
Billy Pegram was at the Board table again and kept trying to vote. He was ignored. I am hopeful that the AG's Opinion will show up soon as I believe it will reflect what Attorney Perry has already stated.
And here is our report:
28 Jan 2016 Board of
Supervisors’ Meeting @ 5p
Thank you for the appointment
this evening.
On 14 Jan 2016, we hand
delivered several requests for Public Records to the Board, Rechelle Siggers
and Adrian McKay. Tonight we would like
to follow-up on these requests.
- The first request was to ask that Adrian McKay’s resume be made
public. This request was backed-up
with our reasons for the request and those reasons were posted on our
website.
- The second request was for copies of invoices to support expenses
from the Housing Department account.
We have repeatedly asked for these supporting documents since
2011. Now, it is my understanding
that no supporting documents can be found and that the Housing Authority
in Clarksdale is not cooperating.
The total amount of these claims is: $376,368. This delay and reporting back to the
public is unacceptable and unlawful.
This money belongs to the citizens of Tunica County and if
Clarksdale thinks they have the right to deny this information, we need
you to make them available to the public and to look for another authority
that understands the public’s right to know.
- The third request is also about Housing. On Sep 2014, we asked for the names of
the person(s) or company that sold the new home covered in claim #25579. Additionally, we are asking that in the
future you all consider disclosing the names of the person(s) or company
that is involved in these sales.
Here is the reason: Transparency.
Mr. Dunn is involved in real estate and the building and selling of
homes in Tunica County. We the
public have a right to know who is involved with the housing dollars in
our budget. Mr. Dunn has, for
whatever reason, made an exception in his vote to approve the Housing
claims when you all vote to approve claims. That is his choice and it is his
business. However, we’re asking
that if there is nothing to hide, make the public aware.
- The last item in our report is a suggestion we would like you to consider. We are asking you to consider officially changing the name of the Battle Arena to the Tunica County Arena and Expo. If Paul Battle’s name can be place under this new name, there would be no honor lost. This just makes more sense when trying to market this facility.
About comment #1: McKay told Sonny Nickson there would be no problem with releasing his resume.
A comment about #3. I don't think James Dunn was very happy with this request. Sorry about that James. The public needs to know who is the seller of the homes that are coming through our Housing Dept. Why would you have a problem with that?
Saturday, January 23, 2016
The proof is in the action of the would be candidates....
Why do some people keep saying that Billy Pegram won the Beat 5 Supervisors' election in Nov?
Let's look at the facts:
Rev Daley won the Primary election on 4 Aug 2015.
Judge Lackey vacated the Primary on 26 Oct 2015.
Therefore, there was not a winner of the Primary to move to the General on 3 Nov 2015.
Billy Pegram had qualified as an Independent to run in the General Election.
Are you saying that Billy Pegram won against Rev Daley or are you saying Billy Pegram won because there was not a candidate from the Primary to run in the General.
Here is the answer: By Judge Lackey's order, there was no Primary. Therefore, there was no General for the position of Beat 5 Supervisor.
So, here is another question: How come it is okay to ignore Judge Lackey's order in the Beat 5 Supervisor's election but enforce Judge Lackey's order in the Boykin problem?
And now Craig Jones wants to withdraw? Why is that? Answer the question Craig. Why are you withdrawing now? Because you too think Billy Pegram won the election and now there is no reason to continue pursuit of the Beat 5 Supervisor position? Come on Craig, Tell us why you are withdrawing now.
This is my take: This whole election was a set-up to regain power.
1. Beat 1: This was an honest effort to win an election. No problem.
2. Beat 2: This contest had too many candidates. Secondly, there were too many candidates who were not qualified in the area of knowledge about our County government. Most of the candidates didn't even bother to attend BOS's meetings. The Supervisor we have in Beat 2, won the election but has a long way to go in understanding the ins and outs of operations. I will say however, that the new Supervisor did vote to approve payroll and travel. So, what is the difference between Dec 2015 and Jan 2016? In Dec 2015 Burnett continued to vote against payroll and claims and travel and even approving the previous month's minutes. In Jan 2016, Johnson voted for payroll and travel. In my opinion, Burnett was playing games and it looks like Johnson is at least trying to learn. I do however, still object to all of the white people who turned out to vote for Johnson but continue to not attend BOS's Meetings. Oh and Michael Johnson, I object to you abstaining on the vote to remove Billy Pegram from the BOSs' table. Did you abstain because you didn't understand what the Board's attorney reported or did you abstain because you didn't want to vote against a fellow farmer?
3. Beat 3: I can't remember the lady's name that ran against Phillis Williams. But why? She sure seemed friendly with Clara Burnett and to me, she didn't appear knowledgeable about County government. I still don't think Williams voted in the best interest of the County in replacing Michael Thompson but otherwise Williams has done mostly a good job.
4. Beat 4: Who put Craig Harris up to run against Sonny Nickson. Harris doesn't live here.
5. Beat 5: I don't know why Judge Lackey approved Craig Jones to run in Tunica County. He claims homestead in Desoto County. Why do people think they can live outside of our County and run in our elections? Why was Curley Matthews running?
By the way, I still don't believe Cedric Burnett lives in Tunica County. He has a house here but where does he lay his head at night? Tunica, you keep putting up with this game playing. Why are you doing that?
And what about our current County Administrator trying to vote in our Primary when he lives in Olive Branch, MS? I have presented the evidence to the BOSs and they still voted to make him our County Administrator. Crazy.
It seems to me that most of these people were encourages to run in the Primary and expected to lose in the General to regain old power. I feel sure that is the case in Beat 5. And what about Jacqueline Boykin? Was she expected to beat Wes Ryals or was she a sacrificial lamb to displace Judge Linzy?
And how dare she go after individual citizens for $15,000 when she knows she voted in TN on 14 Nov 2014? Dishonest Jacqueline, dishonest. And why is MBI Captain Peter Clinton no longer employed at MBI? And why hasn't Attorney General Jim Hood acted on the MBI report suggesting Boykin be charged with 2 counts of voter fraud? And why didn't Gov Bryant set a date for a Special Election in Beat 5? As I've stated in a previous post, by not setting a date for a Special Election, Gov Bryant has effectively called the Beat 5 Election. Special Elections have been set before. Why is this any different?
And then there is Circuit Clerk, Sharon Granberry. Why do some folks keep repeating that the messed up voter rolls were the fault of the DEC? They were not. The Election Commission and the Circuit Clerk are responsible for those massive errors. And why didn't Granberry replace the erroneous lists on 4 Aug...just as soon as she discovered they were wrong? And I understand it was Granberry who called Attorney Kim Turner in the Sec of State's office to have me removed from the Library where I was a poll watcher for Marilyn Young. To say I was disrupting the voting process is a lie. That is unless you count knitting and drinking Powerade as disruptive. Oh, and then the Sheriff's dispatch sent the Town of Tunica Police to do what? They didn't find anything amiss. Total harassment. It is really quite laughable what some people will do to show just how powerful they are not.
And now we have the ongoing problem of Billy Pegram sitting at the Board of Supervisors' table and suing Rev Daley and the Board of Supervisors for a place at the table. Billy Pegram: YOU DID NOT WIN THE ELECTION. THERE WAS NO ELECTION.
Let's look at the facts:
Rev Daley won the Primary election on 4 Aug 2015.
Judge Lackey vacated the Primary on 26 Oct 2015.
Therefore, there was not a winner of the Primary to move to the General on 3 Nov 2015.
Billy Pegram had qualified as an Independent to run in the General Election.
Are you saying that Billy Pegram won against Rev Daley or are you saying Billy Pegram won because there was not a candidate from the Primary to run in the General.
Here is the answer: By Judge Lackey's order, there was no Primary. Therefore, there was no General for the position of Beat 5 Supervisor.
So, here is another question: How come it is okay to ignore Judge Lackey's order in the Beat 5 Supervisor's election but enforce Judge Lackey's order in the Boykin problem?
And now Craig Jones wants to withdraw? Why is that? Answer the question Craig. Why are you withdrawing now? Because you too think Billy Pegram won the election and now there is no reason to continue pursuit of the Beat 5 Supervisor position? Come on Craig, Tell us why you are withdrawing now.
This is my take: This whole election was a set-up to regain power.
1. Beat 1: This was an honest effort to win an election. No problem.
2. Beat 2: This contest had too many candidates. Secondly, there were too many candidates who were not qualified in the area of knowledge about our County government. Most of the candidates didn't even bother to attend BOS's meetings. The Supervisor we have in Beat 2, won the election but has a long way to go in understanding the ins and outs of operations. I will say however, that the new Supervisor did vote to approve payroll and travel. So, what is the difference between Dec 2015 and Jan 2016? In Dec 2015 Burnett continued to vote against payroll and claims and travel and even approving the previous month's minutes. In Jan 2016, Johnson voted for payroll and travel. In my opinion, Burnett was playing games and it looks like Johnson is at least trying to learn. I do however, still object to all of the white people who turned out to vote for Johnson but continue to not attend BOS's Meetings. Oh and Michael Johnson, I object to you abstaining on the vote to remove Billy Pegram from the BOSs' table. Did you abstain because you didn't understand what the Board's attorney reported or did you abstain because you didn't want to vote against a fellow farmer?
3. Beat 3: I can't remember the lady's name that ran against Phillis Williams. But why? She sure seemed friendly with Clara Burnett and to me, she didn't appear knowledgeable about County government. I still don't think Williams voted in the best interest of the County in replacing Michael Thompson but otherwise Williams has done mostly a good job.
4. Beat 4: Who put Craig Harris up to run against Sonny Nickson. Harris doesn't live here.
5. Beat 5: I don't know why Judge Lackey approved Craig Jones to run in Tunica County. He claims homestead in Desoto County. Why do people think they can live outside of our County and run in our elections? Why was Curley Matthews running?
By the way, I still don't believe Cedric Burnett lives in Tunica County. He has a house here but where does he lay his head at night? Tunica, you keep putting up with this game playing. Why are you doing that?
And what about our current County Administrator trying to vote in our Primary when he lives in Olive Branch, MS? I have presented the evidence to the BOSs and they still voted to make him our County Administrator. Crazy.
It seems to me that most of these people were encourages to run in the Primary and expected to lose in the General to regain old power. I feel sure that is the case in Beat 5. And what about Jacqueline Boykin? Was she expected to beat Wes Ryals or was she a sacrificial lamb to displace Judge Linzy?
And how dare she go after individual citizens for $15,000 when she knows she voted in TN on 14 Nov 2014? Dishonest Jacqueline, dishonest. And why is MBI Captain Peter Clinton no longer employed at MBI? And why hasn't Attorney General Jim Hood acted on the MBI report suggesting Boykin be charged with 2 counts of voter fraud? And why didn't Gov Bryant set a date for a Special Election in Beat 5? As I've stated in a previous post, by not setting a date for a Special Election, Gov Bryant has effectively called the Beat 5 Election. Special Elections have been set before. Why is this any different?
And then there is Circuit Clerk, Sharon Granberry. Why do some folks keep repeating that the messed up voter rolls were the fault of the DEC? They were not. The Election Commission and the Circuit Clerk are responsible for those massive errors. And why didn't Granberry replace the erroneous lists on 4 Aug...just as soon as she discovered they were wrong? And I understand it was Granberry who called Attorney Kim Turner in the Sec of State's office to have me removed from the Library where I was a poll watcher for Marilyn Young. To say I was disrupting the voting process is a lie. That is unless you count knitting and drinking Powerade as disruptive. Oh, and then the Sheriff's dispatch sent the Town of Tunica Police to do what? They didn't find anything amiss. Total harassment. It is really quite laughable what some people will do to show just how powerful they are not.
And now we have the ongoing problem of Billy Pegram sitting at the Board of Supervisors' table and suing Rev Daley and the Board of Supervisors for a place at the table. Billy Pegram: YOU DID NOT WIN THE ELECTION. THERE WAS NO ELECTION.
Thieves....
So, you thieves think you can keep breaking into houses and stealing? Let me tell you something, the Tunica Police Department is tenacious and so are the Tuchels.
My husband works hard for the things that we own. What makes you think you are entitled to other folk's stuff? And on top of that, you crushed my tomato plants. I have been nursing those plants for three months so we could have really good tomatoes in the middle of winter. And just when they are starting to ripen, you break into our home and crush them.
You thieves are despicable. Get a job and buy your own stuff.
And this is what we know so far: Prior to our break-in, the Tunica Police Department caught 2 of the thieves who are committing these burglaries. They were two 15 year old kids with records. And what did the judge do? Released them to their parents. Are you kidding me?
I don't know if these kids are the same people who broke into our home but why would these kids be released rather then sent to jail? At the very least, they needed to be locked up until these break-ins stopped. I'm going to find out the name of the judge who released these juvenile delinquents.
My husband works hard for the things that we own. What makes you think you are entitled to other folk's stuff? And on top of that, you crushed my tomato plants. I have been nursing those plants for three months so we could have really good tomatoes in the middle of winter. And just when they are starting to ripen, you break into our home and crush them.
You thieves are despicable. Get a job and buy your own stuff.
And this is what we know so far: Prior to our break-in, the Tunica Police Department caught 2 of the thieves who are committing these burglaries. They were two 15 year old kids with records. And what did the judge do? Released them to their parents. Are you kidding me?
I don't know if these kids are the same people who broke into our home but why would these kids be released rather then sent to jail? At the very least, they needed to be locked up until these break-ins stopped. I'm going to find out the name of the judge who released these juvenile delinquents.
Thursday, January 14, 2016
14 Jan 2016 Board of Supervisors' Meeting
Tonight's meeting began with Board Attorney John Perry explaining his research surrounding the Beat 5 Supervisor position. Perry has also requested an Attorney General's Opinion on the same.
From what Perry reported, it was clear that Billy Pegram is not the Supervisor for Beat 5. James Dunn asked Pegram to leave the Board table. Pegram responded that he had as much right to sit at the table as he (Dunn) did. The BOS then voted to ask Pegram to remove himself. Dunn then asked the Sheriff to escort Pregram from the table. And guess what Sheriff Hamp did? He refused.
I was sitting next to Dollie Hudson who made a very hushed noise. Sheriff Hamp stood up and pointed at Hudson and asked one of his deputies to escort Hudson from the room. As Hudson was leaving the room Hamp said something about don't say anything else or you will be arrested and taken to jail. Hamp then lectured the audience about being quiet during Board Meetings.
This was all very upsetting. In the past, I have asked and asked the BOS to remove Hamp from their table. Maybe now they will think about doing this. Serve and protect Hamp NOT lecture and threaten.
And about James Dunn. Dunn handled the removal of Hudson with professionalism. He got up from his chair; went into the lobby; brought in Hudson's chair and Hudson. Thank you Mr. Dunn. That is exactly what needed to happen.
From what Perry reported, it was clear that Billy Pegram is not the Supervisor for Beat 5. James Dunn asked Pegram to leave the Board table. Pegram responded that he had as much right to sit at the table as he (Dunn) did. The BOS then voted to ask Pegram to remove himself. Dunn then asked the Sheriff to escort Pregram from the table. And guess what Sheriff Hamp did? He refused.
I was sitting next to Dollie Hudson who made a very hushed noise. Sheriff Hamp stood up and pointed at Hudson and asked one of his deputies to escort Hudson from the room. As Hudson was leaving the room Hamp said something about don't say anything else or you will be arrested and taken to jail. Hamp then lectured the audience about being quiet during Board Meetings.
This was all very upsetting. In the past, I have asked and asked the BOS to remove Hamp from their table. Maybe now they will think about doing this. Serve and protect Hamp NOT lecture and threaten.
And about James Dunn. Dunn handled the removal of Hudson with professionalism. He got up from his chair; went into the lobby; brought in Hudson's chair and Hudson. Thank you Mr. Dunn. That is exactly what needed to happen.
14 Jan 2016 Special Delivery
Tonight I delivered printed information and requests to the Board of Supervisors. The following were given to Chancery Clerk Rechelle Siggers for distribution.
14 Jan 2016: Hand delivered @
5p Board of Supervisors’ Meeting
To: James Dunn
Michael Johnson
Phillis Williams
Sonny Nickson
Rev. McKinley Daley
I am writing to you today to
request that you make available to the public a copy of the resume used in the
hiring of the Tunica County Comptroller, Adrian McKay. McKay is now our County Administrator and it
seems important that the public see for themselves the qualifications he brings
to the job.
This request is being made due
to the history of others who have served as our County Administrators. Here is a brief recount:
1.
At the beginning
of this century, Kenneth Murphree was the Tunica County County
Administrator. Under his leadership,
many facilities were built and bonds issued.
Because of these actions and with the approval of past Boards, Tunica
County now finds itself in a financial crisis.
2.
The next County
Administrator, Clifton Johnson, oversaw the refunding of many of these bonds; a
reduction in our income; a less than favorable employee health plan; the
building of manufacturing plants that do not contribute jobs or taxes to
Tunica’s General Fund. Additionally,
there was not a suggestion of a tax increase until late in 2013 and the
administration under Johnson was not very transparent.
3.
The next County
Administrator, Michael Thompson, came to us with credentials in place that were
easily verified. Under Thompson’s
leadership, it became apparent that our government was not sustainable in its
present form. Thompson was moving us
toward sustainability and yet you chose to replace him.
The public has a right to know
the qualifications of each and every County Administrator. Hence our request.
Following please find a
Freedom of Information letter asking you to provide a copy of the original
resume that was used to hire Adrian Mckay.
Sincerely,
Barbara R. Tuchel
Cc: Rechelle Siggers
Adrian McKay
Robert Tuchel
14 Jan 2015:
Hand delivered at Board of Supervisors’ Meeting @ 5p
To: James Dunn
Michael Johnson
Phillis Williams
Sonny Nickson
Rev. McKinley Daley
Pursuant to
the state open records law, MS Code Sections 25-61-1 to 25-61-17, I write to
request a copy of the resume used in the hiring of Adrian McKay as the Tunica
County Comptroller:
It is provided
by the MS open records law that a response is expect within fourteen (14)
business days (MS Code Section 25-61-5(1)).
If you choose
to deny this request, please provide a written explanation for the denial
including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s) upon which you
rely.
Please be
advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy necessary to obtain
access to the requested records. I
would note that willful violation of the open records law can result in a fine
of up to $100 and all reasonable litigation expenses (MS Code Section
25-61-15).
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Barbara R.
Tuchel
Cc: Rechelle
Siggers
Adrian McKay
Robert
Tuchel
Next:
14
Jan 2016: Hand delivered @5p Board of Supervisors’ Meeting
To: James Dunn
Michael Thompson
Phillis Williams
Sonny Nickson
Rev. McKinley Daley
The
following is a copy of a Freedom of Information letter that was never
answered. After this letter was sent, I
verbally requested the information on more than one occasion.
This
information is being requested because the worksheet for this budgeting period
shows only the $19,500, $13,000 and the $15,800 from May 2010 until the end of
Sep 2010. The $104,711 and $223,357
amounts were found in the listing of claims for Housing. To my recollection the
budget for Housing was reduced to $300,000 for 2009 – 2010.
We
would like to see the supporting documents for each of these claims. Additionally, I have great concern that
information and documents that are sent to the Housing Authority in Clarksdale
are not available to the public.
Here
is the letter:
28
May 2015: Hand delivered at Board of Supervisors’ Meeting @ 5p
Dear
Mr. Thompson:
Pursuant
to the state open records law, MS Code Sections 25-61-1 to 25-61-17, I write to
request copies of the supporting documents for the following claims:
Invoice: 11232009
Invoice Date: 11/23/2009
Post Date: 11/30/2009
Check Date: 12/07/2009
Check Number: 92998
Claim: 1270
Invoice Amount: $19,500.00
Status: P
Invoice: 0126210
Invoice Date: 1/26/2010
Post Date: 1/31/2010
Check Date: 2/1/2010
Check Number: 93516
Claim: 1903
Invoice Amount: $13,000.00
Status: P
Invoice: 03242010
Invoice Date: 3/24/2010
Post Date: 3/31/2010
Check Date: 4/05/2010
Check Number: 94135
Claim: 2522
Invoice Amount: $15,800.00
Status: P
Invoice: 05252010
Invoice Date: 5/25/2010
Post Date: 5/31/2010
Check Date: 6/7/2010
Check Number: 95129
Claim: 3472
Invoice Amount: $104,711.00
Status: P
Invoice: 08212010
Invoice Date: 8/21/2010
Post Date: 8/31/2010
Check Date: 9/7/2010
Check Number: 96478
Claim: 5069
Invoice Amount: $223,357.00
Status: P
It
is provided by the MS open records law that a response is expect within fourteen
(14) business days (MS Code Section 25-61-5(1)).
If
you choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation for the
denial including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s) upon which
you rely.
Please
be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy necessary to
obtain access to the requested records.
I would note that willful violation of the open records law can result
in a fine of up to $100 and all reasonable litigation expenses (MS Code Section
25-61-15).
Thank
you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Barbara
R. Tuchel
Cc: Michael
Thompson
Ellis Pittman
Robert Tuch
Next: Handwritten note attached stating this letter was never answered.
DELIVERED
Via Email 8 Sep 2014
Dear
Mr. McKay:
Pursuant
to the state open records law, MS Code Sections 25-61-1 to 25-61-17, I write to
request the name(s) of the company or person(s) who sold the homes covered by
the new homeowner claim #25579. There
were 2 claims for $10,000 each in the Aug 2014 claims. It is my understanding that $12,000 of this
$32,000 claim is the monthly payment by Tunica County
to Tunica County Housing, Inc.
It
is provided by the MS open records law that a response is expect within
fourteen (14) business days (MS Code Section 25-61-5(1)).
If
you choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation for the
denial including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s) upon which
you rely.
Please
be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy necessary to
obtain access to the requested records.
I would note that willful violation of the open records law can result
in a fine of up to $100 and all reasonable litigation expenses (MS Code Section
25-61-15).
Thank you for your
assistance.
Sincerely,
Barbara
R. Tuchel
Cc: Michael
Thompson
Ellis Pittman
Robert
Tuchel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)